Internet Governance 9 November 2012

Internet Governance & Sustainable Development – The Case of Small Island Developing States

Tracy Hackshaw
By Tracy HackshawGuest Author

I will be posting a report here shortly on what I consider (perhaps I am biased) to be the most important workshop at IGF 2012 – Internet Governance & Sustainable Development: the Case of Small Island Developing States.

The Workshop was a Feeder Workshop into the Main Session on Internet Governance for Development (IG4D) held on Wednesday 7 November 2012.

Suffice to say, this Workshop attracted interest from only those who showed  interest in Small Island Developing States (SIDS). But who are these SIDS?

SIDS can be found in roughly in three regions: – the Atlantic, Indian Ocean and South China Sea (AIMS) Region (comprising 8 Nation States); – the Caribbean Region (comprising 16 Nation States); and – the Pacific Region (comprising 14 Nation States). Such numbers do not include those SIDS which are not UN-member States, but though not counted these island states are nonetheless recognised by the UN-OHRLLS as SIDS.

Here is the most recent listing of SIDS:

List of Small Island Developing States
(UN Members)

1 Antigua and Barbuda 20 Federated States of Micronesia
2 Bahamas 21 Mauritius
3 Bahrain 22 Nauru
4 Barbados 23 Palau
5 Belize 24 Papua New Guinea
6 Cape Verde * 25 Samoa *
7 Comoros * 26 São Tomé and Principe *
8 Cuba 27 Singapore
9 Dominica 28 St. Kitts and Nevis
10 Dominican Republic 29 St. Lucia
11 Fiji 30 St. Vincent and the Grenadines
12 Grenada 31 Seychelles
13 Guinea-Bissau * 32 Solomon Islands *
14 Guyana 33 Suriname
15 Haiti * 34 Timor-Lesté *
16 Jamaica 35 Tonga
17 Kiribati * 36 Trinidad and Tobago
18 Maldives * 37 Tuvalu *
19 Marshall Islands 38 Vanuatu *

 

List of Small Island Developing States
(Non-UN Members/Associate Members of the Regional Commissions)

1 American Samoa 8 Guam
2 Anguilla 9 Montserrat
3 Aruba 10 Netherlands Antilles
4 British Virgin Islands 11 New Calendonia
5 Commonwealth of Northern Marianas 12 Niue
6 Cook Islands 13 Puerto Rico
7 French Polynesia 14 U.S. Virgin Islands

*Also LDCs

 

world map

The Barbados Programme of Action (BPOA; adopted in 1994) which was further complemented by the Mauritius Strategy of Implementation (MSI 2005 and MSI+5 Outcome document), both recognised that despite being afflicted by economic difficulties and confronted by development imperatives consistent to developing countries generally; SIDS have their own peculiar vulnerabilities and characteristics. Such difficulties in the pursuit of sustainable development are particularly unique, severe and complex.

map of oceania map of atlantic ocean map of indian ocean

The following serves as an identification of some of the critical issues for SIDS:

  • Small size – There are many disadvantages that derive from small size, including a narrow range of resources, which forces undue specialisation; excessive dependence on international trade causing vulnerability to global developments; high population density, which increases the pressure on already limited resources; over-use of resources and premature depletion; relatively small watersheds and threatened supplies of fresh water; costly public administration and infrastructure, including transportation and communication; and limited institutional capacities, domestic markets and export volumes leading to non-existent economies of scale.
  • Isolation – Due to their geographic dispersion, isolation from markets and remote locations many SIDS are disadvantaged economically by small economies of scale, high freight costs and reduced competitiveness.
  • Climate change and sea-level rise – Due to the coastal zone concentration in a limited land area, the adverse effects of climate change and sea-level rise present significant risks to the sustainable development of SIDS, and the long-term effects of climate change may threaten the very existence and viability of some SIDS.
  • Natural and environmental disasters – SIDS are located among the most vulnerable regions in the world in relation to the intensity and frequency of natural and environmental disasters and their increasing impact, and face disproportionately high economic, social and environmental consequences.
  • Brain drain – Owing to their small size there are not sufficient jobs for specialised fields nor can local industry compete with international multinational corporations for talented workers therefore many educated citizens leave SIDS to seek out job opportunities and enhanced financial gain in developed countries.
  • Reliance on Agriculture, Fishing and Tourism- generally owing to their common colonial past the majority of SIDS rely on Agriculture, Fishing and Tourism for income. These sectors have been particularly hit by climate change, natural disasters and the Global Economic Downturn, making SIDS in dire need of diversification of their economies and retraining of unskilled workers to ensure sustainability.

These critical issues accentuate other challenges facing developing countries in general, for instance, difficulties in benefiting from trade liberalisation and globalisation; heavy dependence on welfare and external funding which can be easily impacted by global economic decline; energy dependence and access issue; the limited freshwater resources; limited land resulting in land degradation, which affects waste management, and vulnerable biodiversity resources.

(Source:http://sidsnet.org)

Indeed, issues relating to and resulting from the marginalisation of SIDS from the international Internet Governance (IG) debate are increasingly becoming critical as the Internet Governance (IG) agenda and discussions evolve and move rapidly forward to conclusions. Being so widely dispersed and twinned in regions with larger, more developed neighbouring countries means that such discussions pass without the meaningful input of the 52 SIDS.

This is due in part by lack of capacity and in part by their minority voice in the regions identified. On the path to the June 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio +20) and leading to WSIS +10, a comprehensive SIDS position on Internet Governance issues is required, at all levels including Governmental/Public Sector, Academia, Private Sector and Civil Society.

The IGF 2012 Workshop attempted, for the first time, to co-ordinate the SIDS IG Agenda and to address the potential impact of IG issues on human, social and economic development within the SIDS.

The Workshop took the form of an interactive session with representative Workshop Panelists from the SIDS regions as well as stakeholder organisations and addressed:

  1. Access & Diversity in SIDS
  2. Critical ICT Infrastructure and Internet Resource Issues in SIDS
  3. How ICT can assist with the challenges and opportunities brought about by Emerging Issues in SIDS
  4. Specific IG Issues relevant to SIDS and evaluation of Commonality of such IG issues amongst SIDS
  5. Evaluation of the commonality and need for Capacity Development in the areas of Security, Openness and Privacy among SIDS
  6. Development of an Action Plan and Research Agenda for moving forward

Disclaimer: Viewpoints expressed in this post are those of the author and may or may not reflect official Internet Society positions.

Related Posts

Internet Governance 13 December 2024

Building Our Multistakeholder Digital Future, IGF 2024

Ahead of the 2024 Internet Governance Forum (IGF), we recognize the importance of the multistakeholder approach to Internet governance...

Internet Governance 20 November 2024

Unpacking Internet Governance and Our Work in the United Nations

Dive into Internet governance, our work in the United Nations, and multistakeholderism in this Q&A with Mona Gaballa and...

Strengthening the Internet 24 September 2024

Looking Beyond the Global Digital Compact 

At the United Nations Summit of the Future in September 2024, world leaders adopted the Global Digital Compact. The...